↓ Skip to main content

Improved web-based calculators for predicting breast carcinoma outcomes

Overview of attention for article published in Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, February 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
58 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
Title
Improved web-based calculators for predicting breast carcinoma outcomes
Published in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, February 2011
DOI 10.1007/s10549-011-1366-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

James S. Michaelson, L. Leon Chen, Devon Bush, Allan Fong, Barbara Smith, Jerry Younger

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 46 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 28%
Student > Bachelor 5 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 9%
Student > Master 4 9%
Student > Postgraduate 2 4%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 12 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Mathematics 2 4%
Other 7 15%
Unknown 15 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 July 2018.
All research outputs
#7,573,552
of 23,096,849 outputs
Outputs from Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
#1,685
of 4,688 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,346
of 199,874 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
#24
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,096,849 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,688 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,874 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.