| Title |
Computational molecular species delimitation and taxonomic revision of the gecko genus Ebenavia Boettger, 1878
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Science of Nature, July 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00114-018-1574-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Oliver Hawlitschek, Mark D. Scherz, Bernhard Ruthensteiner, Angelica Crottini, Frank Glaw |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 40 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 18% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 8% |
| Canada | 2 | 5% |
| Japan | 2 | 5% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
| Brazil | 1 | 3% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 3% |
| Thailand | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 20 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 35 | 88% |
| Scientists | 3 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 32 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 19% |
| Researcher | 5 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 6% |
| Professor | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 12 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 38% |
| Environmental Science | 6 | 19% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 6% |
| Chemistry | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 11 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 39. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 July 2023.
All research outputs
#1,073,362
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from The Science of Nature
#147
of 2,282 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,356
of 342,773 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Science of Nature
#2
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,282 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,773 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.