| Title |
A predatory land snail invades central-western Argentina
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biological Invasions, December 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10530-006-9076-7 |
| Authors |
Claudio G. De Francesco, Humberto Lagiglia |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| New Zealand | 1 | 3% |
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| South Africa | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 27 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 12 | 40% |
| Professor | 5 | 17% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Unknown | 2 | 7% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 20 | 67% |
| Environmental Science | 5 | 17% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 4 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 February 2016.
All research outputs
#3,742,545
of 22,656,971 outputs
Outputs from Biological Invasions
#576
of 2,320 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,631
of 155,548 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Invasions
#2
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,656,971 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,320 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 155,548 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.