You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Integrative genomics identifies LMO1 as a neuroblastoma oncogene
|
---|---|
Published in |
Nature, December 2010
|
DOI | 10.1038/nature09609 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Kai Wang, Sharon J. Diskin, Haitao Zhang, Edward F. Attiyeh, Cynthia Winter, Cuiping Hou, Robert W. Schnepp, Maura Diamond, Kristopher Bosse, Patrick A. Mayes, Joseph Glessner, Cecilia Kim, Edward Frackelton, Maria Garris, Qun Wang, Wendy Glaberson, Rosetta Chiavacci, Le Nguyen, Jayanti Jagannathan, Norihisa Saeki, Hiroki Sasaki, Struan F. A. Grant, Achille Iolascon, Yael P. Mosse, Kristina A. Cole, Hongzhe Li, Marcella Devoto, Patrick W. McGrady, Wendy B. London, Mario Capasso, Nazneen Rahman, Hakon Hakonarson, John M. Maris |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 240 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 6 | 3% |
Germany | 3 | 1% |
Belgium | 3 | 1% |
Switzerland | 2 | <1% |
Italy | 2 | <1% |
Montenegro | 1 | <1% |
India | 1 | <1% |
Czechia | 1 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Other | 5 | 2% |
Unknown | 215 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 71 | 30% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 39 | 16% |
Student > Master | 22 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 17 | 7% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 12 | 5% |
Other | 48 | 20% |
Unknown | 31 | 13% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 99 | 41% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 51 | 21% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 39 | 16% |
Neuroscience | 5 | 2% |
Social Sciences | 3 | 1% |
Other | 13 | 5% |
Unknown | 30 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 October 2023.
All research outputs
#5,559,757
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#61,334
of 98,779 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,554
of 194,608 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#433
of 626 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98,779 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.5. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,608 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 626 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.