↓ Skip to main content

Management of Lateral Elbow Tendinopathy: One Size Does Not Fit All.

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
185 X users
facebook
8 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
video
4 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
112 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
962 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Management of Lateral Elbow Tendinopathy: One Size Does Not Fit All.
Published in
Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy, September 2015
DOI 10.2519/jospt.2015.5841
Pubmed ID
Authors

Brooke K Coombes, Leanne Bisset, Bill Vicenzino

Abstract

Synopsis Clear guidelines for the clinical management of individuals with lateral elbow tendinopathy (LET) are hampered by the proposal of many potential interventions and the condition's prognosis ranging from immediate resolution of symptoms following simple advice in some patients, to long-lasting problems, regardless of treatment, in others. This is compounded by our lack of understanding of the complexity of the underlying pathophysiology. In this paper, we collate evidence and expert opinion on the pathophysiology, clinical presentation, and differential diagnosis of LET. Factors that might provide prognostic value or direction for physical rehabilitation, such as the presence of neck pain, tendon tears, or central sensitization, are canvassed. Clinical recommendations for physical rehabilitation are provided, including the prescription of exercise and adjunctive physical and pharmacotherapies. A preliminary algorithm, including targeted interventions, for the management of subgroups of patients with LET based on identified prognostic factors is proposed. Further research is needed to evaluate whether such an approach leads to improved outcomes and more efficient resource allocation. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther, Epub 17 Sep 2015. doi:10.2519/jospt.2015.5841.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 185 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 962 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 3 <1%
United States 3 <1%
France 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 952 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 153 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 126 13%
Student > Master 122 13%
Other 112 12%
Student > Postgraduate 64 7%
Other 132 14%
Unknown 253 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 311 32%
Medicine and Dentistry 254 26%
Sports and Recreations 59 6%
Social Sciences 11 1%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 <1%
Other 40 4%
Unknown 281 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 118. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 March 2023.
All research outputs
#360,410
of 25,754,670 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy
#125
of 2,398 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,664
of 284,688 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy
#7
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,754,670 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,398 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 284,688 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.