| Title |
The utility of PET-based imaging for prostate cancer biochemical recurrence: a systematic review and meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
World Journal of Urology, July 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00345-018-2403-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Niranjan J. Sathianathen, Mohit Butaney, Badrinath R. Konety |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 52 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 15% |
| Other | 7 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 7 | 13% |
| Unknown | 15 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 40% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 4% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 12% |
| Unknown | 18 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 November 2020.
All research outputs
#4,199,845
of 22,925,760 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Urology
#391
of 2,106 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,565
of 326,341 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Urology
#16
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,925,760 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,106 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,341 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.