↓ Skip to main content

Noncontact identification of sleep-disturbed breathing from smartphone-recorded sounds validated by polysomnography

Overview of attention for article published in Sleep and Breathing, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users
patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
Title
Noncontact identification of sleep-disturbed breathing from smartphone-recorded sounds validated by polysomnography
Published in
Sleep and Breathing, July 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11325-018-1695-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sanjiv Narayan, Priyanka Shivdare, Tharun Niranjan, Kathryn Williams, Jon Freudman, Ruchir Sehra

Abstract

Diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea by the gold-standard of polysomnography (PSG), or by home sleep testing (HST), requires numerous physical connections to the patient which may restrict use of these tools for early screening. We hypothesized that normal and disturbed breathing may be detected by a consumer smartphone without physical connections to the patient using novel algorithms to analyze ambient sound. We studied 91 patients undergoing clinically indicated PSG. Phase I: In a derivation cohort (n = 32), we placed an unmodified Samsung Galaxy S5 without external microphone near the bed to record ambient sounds. We analyzed 12,352 discrete breath/non-breath sounds (386/patient), from which we developed algorithms to remove noise, and detect breaths as envelopes of spectral peaks. Phase II: In a distinct validation cohort (n = 59), we tested the ability of acoustic algorithms to detect AHI < 15 vs AHI > 15 on PSG. Smartphone-recorded sound analyses detected the presence, absence, and types of breath sound. Phase I: In the derivation cohort, spectral analysis identified breaths and apneas with a c-statistic of 0.91, and loud obstruction sounds with c-statistic of 0.95 on receiver operating characteristic analyses, relative to adjudicated events. Phase II: In the validation cohort, automated acoustic analysis provided a c-statistic of 0.87 compared to whole-night PSG. Ambient sounds recorded from a smartphone during sleep can identify apnea and abnormal breathing verified on PSG. Future studies should determine if this approach may facilitate early screening of SDB to identify at-risk patients for definitive diagnosis and therapy. NCT03288376; clinicaltrials.org.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 60 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 12%
Researcher 6 10%
Other 5 8%
Lecturer 3 5%
Student > Postgraduate 3 5%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 28 47%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 18%
Engineering 4 7%
Psychology 4 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Other 7 12%
Unknown 30 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 March 2022.
All research outputs
#3,179,376
of 23,452,723 outputs
Outputs from Sleep and Breathing
#99
of 1,413 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,284
of 330,008 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sleep and Breathing
#2
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,452,723 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,413 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,008 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.