Title |
Therapeutic Strategies to Treat Dry Eye in an Aging Population
|
---|---|
Published in |
Drugs & Aging, June 2015
|
DOI | 10.1007/s40266-015-0277-6 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Nisreen S. Ezuddin, Karam A. Alawa, Anat Galor |
Abstract |
Dry eye (DE) is a prevalent ocular disease that primarily affects the elderly. Affecting up to 30 % of adults aged 50 years and older, DE affects both visual function and quality of life. Symptoms of DE, including ocular pain (aching, burning), visual disturbances, and tearing, can be addressed with therapeutic agents that target dysfunction of the meibomian glands, lacrimal glands, goblet cells, ocular surface, and/or neural network. This review provides an overview of the efficacy, use, and limitations of current therapeutic interventions being used to treat DE. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 66 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 14 | 21% |
Researcher | 8 | 12% |
Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 6% |
Other | 13 | 20% |
Unknown | 17 | 26% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 33% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 11% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 9% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 6% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 5% |
Other | 6 | 9% |
Unknown | 18 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 September 2015.
All research outputs
#18,426,826
of 22,828,180 outputs
Outputs from Drugs & Aging
#1,042
of 1,195 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#189,044
of 263,096 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Drugs & Aging
#12
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,828,180 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,195 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,096 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.