↓ Skip to main content

Bone marrow-derived versus adipose-derived stem cells in wound healing: value and route of administration

Overview of attention for article published in Cell and Tissue Research, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
Title
Bone marrow-derived versus adipose-derived stem cells in wound healing: value and route of administration
Published in
Cell and Tissue Research, July 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00441-018-2879-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Basma Emad Aboulhoda, Shereen Abd el Fattah

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 38 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 18%
Student > Bachelor 4 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Other 3 8%
Lecturer 2 5%
Other 6 16%
Unknown 13 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 29%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Engineering 2 5%
Other 6 16%
Unknown 13 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 July 2018.
All research outputs
#18,563,902
of 23,839,820 outputs
Outputs from Cell and Tissue Research
#1,645
of 2,279 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#238,242
of 327,982 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell and Tissue Research
#14
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,839,820 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,279 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,982 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.