↓ Skip to main content

Peruvian natural dye plants

Overview of attention for article published in Economic Botany, April 1989
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
Title
Peruvian natural dye plants
Published in
Economic Botany, April 1989
DOI 10.1007/bf02859858
Authors

Kay K. Antúnez de Mayolo

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 12%
Student > Bachelor 4 12%
Student > Master 3 9%
Student > Postgraduate 2 6%
Other 5 15%
Unknown 8 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 6 18%
Arts and Humanities 5 15%
Social Sciences 4 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 6%
Materials Science 2 6%
Other 5 15%
Unknown 9 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 May 2019.
All research outputs
#7,467,636
of 22,829,083 outputs
Outputs from Economic Botany
#274
of 846 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,008
of 14,564 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Economic Botany
#4
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,829,083 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 846 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 14,564 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.