| Title |
Das internationale Forschungsvorhaben Becoming Breastfeeding Friendly. Untersuchung von Rahmenbedingungen zur Stillförderung
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz, July 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00103-018-2784-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Maria Flothkötter, Julia Kunath, Stephanie Lücke, Katharina Reiss, Juliane Menzel, Cornelia Weikert |
| Abstract |
Despite known positive effects for breastfed children and their mothers, only one third of children under four months of age are breastfed exclusively. In addition, an overview of structures, actors, and measures to promote breastfeeding in Germany is missing. In a two-year international research project entitled Becoming Breastfeeding Friendly (BBF), the current status of German breastfeeding support is systematically evaluated on the basis of the Breastfeeding Gear Model (BFGM) which was developed by the Yale School of Public Health. Therefore, committee members with expertise in the healthcare sector, science, policy, and communication evaluate 54 benchmarks of the eight relevant gears: advocacy, political will, legislation & policies, funding & resources, training & program delivery, promotion, research & evaluation, coordination, and goals & monitoring. Based on the identified strengths and needs, concrete calls to action for scaling up breastfeeding promotion are derived and prioritized. BBF started in September 2017 and is conducted in cooperation with the Yale School of Public Health by the Healthy Start - Young Family Network as well as the National Breastfeeding Committee as an initiative of the Federal Ministry of Nutrition and Agriculture. The project assesses the framework conditions for breastfeeding and thus makes a valuable contribution to the health promotion of mother and child and to breastfeeding protection in Germany. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 3 | 60% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 20 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 15% |
| Librarian | 2 | 10% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 5% |
| Professor | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 20% |
| Unknown | 8 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 25% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 15% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 10% |
| Unknown | 7 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 August 2018.
All research outputs
#6,956,765
of 23,096,849 outputs
Outputs from Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz
#316
of 945 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#118,355
of 326,758 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz
#15
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,096,849 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 945 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,758 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.