↓ Skip to main content

Does Low Biodiversity Resulting from Modern Agricultural Practice Affect Crop Pollination and Yield?

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Botany, August 2001
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
6 policy sources
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
142 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
484 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Does Low Biodiversity Resulting from Modern Agricultural Practice Affect Crop Pollination and Yield?
Published in
Annals of Botany, August 2001
DOI 10.1006/anbo.2001.1463
Authors

A. J. Richards

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 484 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 13 3%
United States 10 2%
United Kingdom 6 1%
Spain 4 <1%
Canada 3 <1%
France 2 <1%
South Africa 2 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Other 7 1%
Unknown 435 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 90 19%
Student > Master 90 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 81 17%
Student > Bachelor 56 12%
Professor 25 5%
Other 90 19%
Unknown 52 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 291 60%
Environmental Science 91 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 1%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 7 1%
Social Sciences 6 1%
Other 14 3%
Unknown 68 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2023.
All research outputs
#1,735,748
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Botany
#310
of 3,723 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,242
of 40,370 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Botany
#2
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,723 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 40,370 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.