| Title |
Unintended consequences of decreased PSA-based prostate cancer screening
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
World Journal of Urology, July 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00345-018-2407-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Thomas Ahlering, Linda My Huynh, Kamaljot S. Kaler, Stephen Williams, Kathryn Osann, Jean Joseph, David Lee, John W. Davis, Ronney Abaza, Jihad Kaouk, Vipul Patel, Isaac Yi Kim, James Porter, Jim C. Hu |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 39 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 10% |
| Canada | 3 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 8% |
| France | 2 | 5% |
| Mauritius | 1 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
| Ireland | 1 | 3% |
| Belgium | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Unknown | 19 | 49% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 27 | 69% |
| Scientists | 6 | 15% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 37 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor | 6 | 16% |
| Researcher | 5 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 14% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 7 | 19% |
| Unknown | 9 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 30% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 16% |
| Unknown | 12 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 39. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2020.
All research outputs
#994,819
of 24,626,543 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Urology
#30
of 2,267 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,705
of 331,625 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Urology
#1
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,626,543 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,267 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,625 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.