↓ Skip to main content

Detoxification effects of phytonutrients against environmental toxicants and sharing of clinical experience on practical applications

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Science and Pollution Research, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
13 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
Title
Detoxification effects of phytonutrients against environmental toxicants and sharing of clinical experience on practical applications
Published in
Environmental Science and Pollution Research, August 2015
DOI 10.1007/s11356-015-5263-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Raymond Tsz Man Chung

Abstract

According to the Food and Health Bureau and Trade and Industry Department of the Hong Kong Government, 90 % of the total food supply in Hong Kong was imported from the Mainland China. In addition, the hidden or illegal use of prohibited pesticides, food adulteration (e.g., using industrial salt in food processing, using gutter oil as cooking oil), and pollutions were periodically reported by the media. Excessive exposure to toxic heavy metals or persistent organic pollutants (POPs) from diet or environmental is inevitable amid industrialization and pollution. Understanding of the detoxification ability among nutrients in plant-based food (i.e., phytonutrients in green tea, onion, garlic, coriander, and turmeric) offers therapeutic and preventive effects against the poisoning effects due to these pollutants. Oxidative stress and pro-inflammatory actions are the common mechanisms for heavy metals or POPs toxicities, while phytonutrients counteracts these cellular insults by anti-oxidation, upregulation of anti-inflammatory pathways, and chelation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 2%
Unknown 46 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 7 15%
Student > Master 7 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 11%
Student > Postgraduate 3 6%
Researcher 3 6%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 16 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 9%
Engineering 4 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 4%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 17 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 November 2019.
All research outputs
#2,988,413
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Science and Pollution Research
#473
of 9,883 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,385
of 271,506 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Science and Pollution Research
#5
of 173 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,883 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 271,506 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 173 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.