| Title |
The involvement of magnoflorine in the sedative and anxiolytic effects of Sinomeni Caulis et Rhizoma in mice
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Natural Medicines, March 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11418-013-0754-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
June Bryan I. de la Peña, Hye Lim Lee, Seo Young Yoon, Gun Hee Kim, Yong Soo Lee, Jae Hoon Cheong |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 28 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 21% |
| Researcher | 5 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 5 | 18% |
| Unknown | 4 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 14% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 14% |
| Chemistry | 4 | 14% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 11% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 5 | 18% |
| Unknown | 6 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 September 2015.
All research outputs
#7,467,636
of 22,829,083 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Natural Medicines
#88
of 530 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,722
of 194,733 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Natural Medicines
#4
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,829,083 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 530 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,733 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.