↓ Skip to main content

Mark Coeckelbergh: Growing Moral Relations. Critique of Moral Status Ascription

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
Title
Mark Coeckelbergh: Growing Moral Relations. Critique of Moral Status Ascription
Published in
Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, March 2013
DOI 10.1007/s10806-012-9435-6
Authors

Jac. A. A. Swart

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 25%
Student > Postgraduate 1 25%
Student > Master 1 25%
Unknown 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 2 50%
Philosophy 1 25%
Unknown 1 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2015.
All research outputs
#7,467,636
of 22,829,083 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics
#166
of 397 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,834
of 194,972 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics
#5
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,829,083 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 397 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,972 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.