↓ Skip to main content

Differences on metabolic behavior between intra and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas at 18F-FDG–PET/CT: prognostic implication of metabolic parameters and tumor markers

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical and Translational Oncology, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
Title
Differences on metabolic behavior between intra and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas at 18F-FDG–PET/CT: prognostic implication of metabolic parameters and tumor markers
Published in
Clinical and Translational Oncology, July 2018
DOI 10.1007/s12094-018-1926-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

A. Sabaté-Llobera, L. Gràcia-Sánchez, G. Reynés-Llompart, E. Ramos, L. Lladó, J. Robles, T. Serrano, J. Mestres-Martí, C. Gámez-Cenzano

Abstract

Cholangiocarcinoma is an infrequent neoplasm barely studied with 18F-FDG-PET/CT. We evaluated the metabolic behavior of cholangiocarcinoma in PET/CT according to its location (intra or extrahepatic) and analyzed the relationship between metabolic parameters of the primary tumor and tumor markers (CA19-9 and CEA), determining their prognostic significance. Retrospective study of PET/CT of 60 patients with untreated cholangiocarcinoma, divided into two groups according to tumor location. FDG uptake was evaluated visually and semiquantitatively [SUVmax and tumor-to-liver ratio (TLR)], and differences between intra and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas were tested, both for FDG uptake in the primary tumor and for the presence of regional or distant disease (per-patient), as well as regarding tumor marker levels. A correlation between metabolic parameters and tumor markers was performed, and prognostic value of these factors was determined (univariate and multivariate analyses). Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas were significantly more FDG-avid than extrahepatic ones (p = 0.006 for SUVmax; p = 0.002 for TLR). There were differences neither between both groups considering the capacity of PET/CT to detect regional (p = 0.261) and distant involvement (p = 0.876), nor regarding the levels of tumor markers (p = 0.160 for CA19-9; p = 0.708 for CEA). Metabolic parameters and tumor markers showed a weak positive correlation (R2 0.22-0.27). At the multivariate analysis, advanced stage (p = 0.024), increased CEA (p = 0.022), and higher TLR (p = 0.003) were significantly related with shorter overall survival. Intra and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas behave differently on PET/CT, though no differences between both groups exist in its capacity to detect regional or distant disease. Metabolic parameters and levels of tumor markers seem to relate with tumor burden, impacting in prognosis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 18%
Student > Master 4 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 9%
Lecturer 2 9%
Other 4 18%
Unknown 3 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 36%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 9%
Physics and Astronomy 2 9%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 6 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 2018.
All research outputs
#15,489,360
of 23,096,849 outputs
Outputs from Clinical and Translational Oncology
#687
of 1,324 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#208,361
of 329,174 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical and Translational Oncology
#9
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,096,849 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,324 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,174 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.