↓ Skip to main content

The 2010 Hans Cloos lecture

Overview of attention for article published in Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, July 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#35 of 200)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
Title
The 2010 Hans Cloos lecture
Published in
Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, July 2011
DOI 10.1007/s10064-011-0377-4
Authors

M. G. Culshaw, S. J. Price

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 2%
Unknown 51 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 13%
Student > Bachelor 7 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 10%
Researcher 4 8%
Other 10 19%
Unknown 13 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 15 29%
Engineering 9 17%
Environmental Science 4 8%
Arts and Humanities 2 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 15 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 June 2018.
All research outputs
#7,863,403
of 23,842,189 outputs
Outputs from Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment
#35
of 200 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,616
of 117,681 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,842,189 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 200 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 117,681 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them