You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Evidence for the use of magnetic cues in mound construction by the termite Amitermes meridionalis (Isoptera : Termitinae)
|
---|---|
Published in |
Australian Journal of Zoology, November 2002
|
DOI | 10.1071/zo01061 |
Authors |
P. M. Jacklyn, U. Munro |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 25 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 5 | 20% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 20% |
Researcher | 4 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 8% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 8% |
Other | 3 | 12% |
Unknown | 4 | 16% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 44% |
Environmental Science | 6 | 24% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 12% |
Unknown | 5 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2022.
All research outputs
#4,312,846
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Australian Journal of Zoology
#114
of 747 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,098
of 55,533 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Australian Journal of Zoology
#1
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 747 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 55,533 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them