↓ Skip to main content

Return Migration to Mexico: Does Health Matter?

Overview of attention for article published in Demography, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
88 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
162 Mendeley
Title
Return Migration to Mexico: Does Health Matter?
Published in
Demography, September 2015
DOI 10.1007/s13524-015-0429-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Erika Arenas, Noreen Goldman, Anne R. Pebley, Graciela Teruel

Abstract

We use data from three rounds of the Mexican Family Life Survey to examine whether migrants in the United States returning to Mexico in the period 2005-2012 have worse health than those remaining in the United States. Despite extensive interest by demographers in health-related selection, this has been a neglected area of study in the literature on U.S.-Mexico migration, and the few results to date have been contradictory and inconclusive. Using five self-reported health variables collected while migrants resided in the United States and subsequent migration history, we find direct evidence of higher probabilities of return migration for Mexican migrants in poor health as well as lower probabilities of return for migrants with improving health. These findings are robust to the inclusion of potential confounders reflecting the migrants' demographic characteristics, economic situation, family ties, and origin and destination characteristics. We anticipate that in the coming decade, health may become an even more salient issue in migrants' decisions about returning to Mexico, given the recent expansion in access to health insurance in Mexico.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 162 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 162 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 19%
Lecturer 23 14%
Student > Master 21 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 9%
Student > Bachelor 12 7%
Other 26 16%
Unknown 35 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 57 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 29 18%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 14 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 8%
Psychology 4 2%
Other 3 2%
Unknown 42 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 July 2023.
All research outputs
#14,062,873
of 24,525,534 outputs
Outputs from Demography
#1,808
of 2,003 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,398
of 278,167 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Demography
#19
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,525,534 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,003 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.9. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,167 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.