| Title |
Ecology and evolution of plant diversity in the endangered campo rupestre: a neglected conservation priority
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Plant and Soil, August 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11104-015-2637-8 |
| Authors |
Fernando A. O. Silveira, Daniel Negreiros, Newton P. U. Barbosa, Elise Buisson, Flávio F. Carmo, Daniel W. Carstensen, Abel A. Conceição, Tatiana G. Cornelissen, Lívia Echternacht, G. Wilson Fernandes, Queila S. Garcia, Tadeu J. Guerra, Claudia M. Jacobi, José P. Lemos-Filho, Soizig Le Stradic, Leonor Patrícia C. Morellato, Frederico S. Neves, Rafael S. Oliveira, Carlos E. Schaefer, Pedro L. Viana, Hans Lambers |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | 33% |
| Spain | 1 | 17% |
| Denmark | 1 | 17% |
| France | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 1 | 17% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 83% |
| Scientists | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 582 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 9 | 2% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 572 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 107 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 89 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 67 | 12% |
| Researcher | 51 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 35 | 6% |
| Other | 99 | 17% |
| Unknown | 134 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 264 | 45% |
| Environmental Science | 98 | 17% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 18 | 3% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 14 | 2% |
| Engineering | 5 | <1% |
| Other | 20 | 3% |
| Unknown | 163 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2024.
All research outputs
#1,756,238
of 25,604,262 outputs
Outputs from Plant and Soil
#82
of 3,429 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,452
of 278,058 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant and Soil
#5
of 92 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,604,262 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,429 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,058 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 92 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.