↓ Skip to main content

Evolutionary Perspectives of Genotype–Phenotype Factors in Leishmania Metabolism

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Molecular Evolution, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
Title
Evolutionary Perspectives of Genotype–Phenotype Factors in Leishmania Metabolism
Published in
Journal of Molecular Evolution, July 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00239-018-9857-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Abhishek Subramanian, Ram Rup Sarkar

Abstract

The sandfly midgut and the human macrophage phagolysosome provide antagonistic metabolic niches for the endoparasite Leishmania to survive and populate. Although these environments fluctuate across developmental stages, the relative changes in both these environments across parasite generations might remain gradual. Such environmental restrictions might endow parasite metabolism with a choice of specific genotypic and phenotypic factors that can constrain enzyme evolution for successful adaptation to the host. With respect to the available cellular information for Leishmania species, for the first time, we measure the relative contribution of eight inter-correlated predictors related to codon usage, GC content, gene expression, gene length, multi-functionality, and flux-coupling potential of an enzyme on the evolutionary rates of singleton metabolic genes and further compare their effects across three Leishmania species. Our analysis reveals that codon adaptation, multi-functionality, and flux-coupling potential of an enzyme are independent contributors of enzyme evolutionary rates, which can together explain a large variation in enzyme evolutionary rates across species. We also hypothesize that a species-specific occurrence of duplicated genes in novel subcellular locations can create new flux routes through certain singleton flux-coupled enzymes, thereby constraining their evolution. A cross-species comparison revealed both common and species-specific genes whose evolutionary divergence was constrained by multiple independent factors. Out of these, previously known pharmacological targets and virulence factors in Leishmania were identified, suggesting their evolutionary reasons for being important survival factors to the parasite. All these results provide a fundamental understanding of the factors underlying adaptive strategies of the parasite, which can be further targeted.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 25%
Other 2 17%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 8%
Researcher 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 2 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 33%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 17%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 17%
Computer Science 1 8%
Chemistry 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 July 2018.
All research outputs
#15,540,879
of 23,096,849 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Molecular Evolution
#1,163
of 1,455 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#209,198
of 329,152 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Molecular Evolution
#7
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,096,849 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,455 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,152 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.