↓ Skip to main content

Discovering the Principle of Finality in Computational Machines

Overview of attention for article published in Foundations of Science, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#16 of 275)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
Title
Discovering the Principle of Finality in Computational Machines
Published in
Foundations of Science, February 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10699-018-9552-4
Authors

Gonzalo Génova, Ignacio Quintanilla Navarro

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 22%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 22%
Researcher 1 11%
Other 1 11%
Unknown 3 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Philosophy 2 22%
Computer Science 1 11%
Psychology 1 11%
Physics and Astronomy 1 11%
Engineering 1 11%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2019.
All research outputs
#1,726,979
of 23,096,849 outputs
Outputs from Foundations of Science
#16
of 275 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,877
of 446,389 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Foundations of Science
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,096,849 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 275 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,389 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them