| Title |
The biology and conservation status of the large hammerhead shark complex: the great, scalloped, and smooth hammerheads
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, July 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11160-018-9530-5 |
| Authors |
Austin J. Gallagher, A. Peter Klimley |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 36 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 17% |
| Australia | 5 | 14% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 6% |
| Thailand | 1 | 3% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 3% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 3% |
| Peru | 1 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| Brazil | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 15 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 22 | 61% |
| Scientists | 12 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 3% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 152 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 152 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 28 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 25 | 16% |
| Researcher | 16 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 10% |
| Other | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 13 | 9% |
| Unknown | 51 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 48 | 32% |
| Environmental Science | 27 | 18% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 4% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 8 | 5% |
| Unknown | 57 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 April 2023.
All research outputs
#1,493,676
of 25,083,571 outputs
Outputs from Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries
#68
of 628 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,887
of 334,967 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries
#4
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,083,571 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 628 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 334,967 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.