↓ Skip to main content

Experimental evidence of non-ideal compressible effects in expanding flow of a high molecular complexity vapor

Overview of attention for article published in Experiments in Fluids, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
Title
Experimental evidence of non-ideal compressible effects in expanding flow of a high molecular complexity vapor
Published in
Experiments in Fluids, July 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00348-018-2578-0
Authors

Andrea Spinelli, Giorgia Cammi, Simone Gallarini, Marta Zocca, Fabio Cozzi, Paolo Gaetani, Vincenzo Dossena, Alberto Guardone

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 30%
Student > Master 4 17%
Researcher 3 13%
Professor 2 9%
Unspecified 2 9%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 3 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 13 57%
Unspecified 2 9%
Energy 1 4%
Psychology 1 4%
Unknown 6 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 July 2018.
All research outputs
#20,527,576
of 23,096,849 outputs
Outputs from Experiments in Fluids
#992
of 1,289 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#286,047
of 326,758 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Experiments in Fluids
#3
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,096,849 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,289 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,758 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.