You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Establishing conservation baselines with dynamic distribution models for bat populations facing imminent decline
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Diversity & Distributions, September 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1111/ddi.12372 |
| Authors |
Thomas J. Rodhouse, Patricia C. Ormsbee, Kathryn M. Irvine, Lee A. Vierling, Joseph M. Szewczak, Kerri T. Vierling |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 5 | 33% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 13% |
| Chile | 2 | 13% |
| United States | 1 | 7% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 4 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 53% |
| Scientists | 5 | 33% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 114 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 110 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 26 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 19 | 17% |
| Unknown | 17 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 49 | 43% |
| Environmental Science | 36 | 32% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 4% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Psychology | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | 3% |
| Unknown | 19 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2016.
All research outputs
#4,192,244
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Diversity & Distributions
#683
of 1,845 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,817
of 285,680 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diversity & Distributions
#16
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,845 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 285,680 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.