↓ Skip to main content

Nano functional neural interfaces

Overview of attention for article published in Nano Research, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
Title
Nano functional neural interfaces
Published in
Nano Research, July 2018
DOI 10.1007/s12274-018-2127-4
Authors

Yongchen Wang, Hanlin Zhu, Huiran Yang, Aaron D. Argall, Lan Luan, Chong Xie, Liang Guo

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 56 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 25%
Researcher 10 18%
Student > Master 9 16%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Other 3 5%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 8 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 15 27%
Neuroscience 8 14%
Chemistry 7 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 7%
Physics and Astronomy 4 7%
Other 8 14%
Unknown 10 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2018.
All research outputs
#15,540,879
of 23,096,849 outputs
Outputs from Nano Research
#746
of 3,020 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#208,332
of 326,351 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nano Research
#26
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,096,849 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,020 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,351 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.