| Title |
Molecular tools for bathing water assessment in Europe: Balancing social science research with a rapidly developing environmental science evidence-base
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ambio, September 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s13280-015-0698-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
David M. Oliver, Nick D. Hanley, Melanie van Niekerk, David Kay, A. Louise Heathwaite, Sharyl J. M. Rabinovici, Julie L. Kinzelman, Lora E. Fleming, Jonathan Porter, Sabina Shaikh, Rob Fish, Sue Chilton, Julie Hewitt, Elaine Connolly, Andy Cummins, Klaus Glenk, Calum McPhail, Eric McRory, Alistair McVittie, Amanna Giles, Suzanne Roberts, Katherine Simpson, Dugald Tinch, Ted Thairs, Lisa M. Avery, Andy J. A. Vinten, Bill D. Watts, Richard S. Quilliam |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 44% |
| Guinea | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 4 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 67% |
| Scientists | 3 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 67 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 12 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 15 | 22% |
| Unknown | 14 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 19 | 28% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 12% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 7 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 8 | 12% |
| Unknown | 20 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 August 2018.
All research outputs
#4,259,644
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Ambio
#765
of 1,954 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,882
of 289,192 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ambio
#17
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,954 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 289,192 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.