You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Thirty new loci for age at menarche identified by a meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Genetics, November 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1038/ng.714 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Cathy E Elks, John R B Perry, Patrick Sulem, Daniel I Chasman, Nora Franceschini, Chunyan He, Kathryn L Lunetta, Jenny A Visser, Enda M Byrne, Diana L Cousminer, Daniel F Gudbjartsson, Tõnu Esko, Bjarke Feenstra, Jouke-Jan Hottenga, Daniel L Koller, Zoltán Kutalik, Peng Lin, Massimo Mangino, Mara Marongiu, Patrick F McArdle, Albert V Smith, Lisette Stolk, Sophie H van Wingerden, Jing Hua Zhao, Eva Albrecht, Tanguy Corre, Erik Ingelsson, Caroline Hayward, Patrik K E Magnusson, Erin N Smith, Shelia Ulivi, Nicole M Warrington, Lina Zgaga, Helen Alavere, Najaf Amin, Thor Aspelund, Stefania Bandinelli, Inês Barroso, Gerald S Berenson, Sven Bergmann, Hannah Blackburn, Eric Boerwinkle, Julie E Buring, Fabio Busonero, Harry Campbell, Stephen J Chanock, Wei Chen, Marilyn C Cornelis, David Couper, Andrea D Coviello, Pio d'Adamo, Ulf de Faire, Eco J C de Geus, Panos Deloukas, Angela Döring, George Davey Smith, Douglas F Easton, Gudny Eiriksdottir, Valur Emilsson, Johan Eriksson, Luigi Ferrucci, Aaron R Folsom, Tatiana Foroud, Melissa Garcia, Paolo Gasparini, Frank Geller, Christian Gieger, Vilmundur Gudnason, Per Hall, Susan E Hankinson, Liana Ferreli, Andrew C Heath, Dena G Hernandez, Albert Hofman, Frank B Hu, Thomas Illig, Marjo-Riitta Järvelin, Andrew D Johnson, David Karasik, Kay-Tee Khaw, Douglas P Kiel, Tuomas O Kilpeläinen, Ivana Kolcic, Peter Kraft, Lenore J Launer, Joop S E Laven, Shengxu Li, Jianjun Liu, Daniel Levy, Nicholas G Martin, Wendy L McArdle, Mads Melbye, Vincent Mooser, Jeffrey C Murray, Sarah S Murray, Michael A Nalls, Pau Navarro, Mari Nelis, Andrew R Ness, Kate Northstone, Ben A Oostra, Munro Peacock, Lyle J Palmer, Aarno Palotie, Guillaume Paré, Alex N Parker, Nancy L Pedersen, Leena Peltonen, Craig E Pennell, Paul Pharoah, Ozren Polasek, Andrew S Plump, Anneli Pouta, Eleonora Porcu, Thorunn Rafnar, John P Rice, Susan M Ring, Fernando Rivadeneira, Igor Rudan, Cinzia Sala, Veikko Salomaa, Serena Sanna, David Schlessinger, Nicholas J Schork, Angelo Scuteri, Ayellet V Segrè, Alan R Shuldiner, Nicole Soranzo, Ulla Sovio, Sathanur R Srinivasan, David P Strachan, Mar-Liis Tammesoo, Emmi Tikkanen, Daniela Toniolo, Kim Tsui, Laufey Tryggvadottir, Jonathon Tyrer, Manuela Uda, Rob M van Dam, Joyce B J van Meurs, Peter Vollenweider, Gerard Waeber, Nicholas J Wareham, Dawn M Waterworth, Michael N Weedon, H Erich Wichmann, Gonneke Willemsen, James F Wilson, Alan F Wright, Lauren Young, Guangju Zhai, Wei Vivian Zhuang, Laura J Bierut, Dorret I Boomsma, Heather A Boyd, Laura Crisponi, Ellen W Demerath, Cornelia M van Duijn, Michael J Econs, Tamara B Harris, David J Hunter, Ruth J F Loos, Andres Metspalu, Grant W Montgomery, Paul M Ridker, Tim D Spector, Elizabeth A Streeten, Kari Stefansson, Unnur Thorsteinsdottir, André G Uitterlinden, Elisabeth Widen, Joanne M Murabito, Ken K Ong, Anna Murray |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 50% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 399 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 2% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| France | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| Iceland | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| China | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 381 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 87 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 74 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 42 | 11% |
| Professor | 28 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 26 | 7% |
| Other | 83 | 21% |
| Unknown | 59 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 106 | 27% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 106 | 27% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 52 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 17 | 4% |
| Psychology | 8 | 2% |
| Other | 32 | 8% |
| Unknown | 78 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 37. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 February 2024.
All research outputs
#1,111,313
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Nature Genetics
#1,843
of 7,639 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,022
of 193,830 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Genetics
#7
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,639 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 43.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 193,830 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.