| Title |
Quality and impact of appraisal for revalidation: the perceptions of London’s responsible officers and their appraisers
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Education, September 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12909-015-0438-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ann Griffin, Daniel S. Furmedge, Deborah Gill, Catherine O’Keeffe, Anju Verma, Laura-Jane Smith, Lorraine Noble, Ray Field, Celia Ingham Clark |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 8 | 89% |
| Unknown | 1 | 11% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 56% |
| Members of the public | 4 | 44% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 28 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 9 | 31% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 14% |
| Researcher | 3 | 10% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 4 | 14% |
| Unknown | 5 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 31% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 17% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 10% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Unknown | 5 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2024.
All research outputs
#7,060,994
of 25,562,515 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Education
#1,222
of 4,023 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,082
of 286,103 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Education
#24
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,562,515 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,023 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,103 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.