↓ Skip to main content

Down from the treetops: red langur (Presbytis rubicunda) terrestrial behavior

Overview of attention for article published in Primates, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
14 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
Title
Down from the treetops: red langur (Presbytis rubicunda) terrestrial behavior
Published in
Primates, July 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10329-018-0676-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Susan M. Cheyne, Supiansyah, Adul, Claire J. Neale, Carolyn Thompson, Cara H. Wilcox, Yvette C. Ehlers Smith, David A. Ehlers Smith

Abstract

Using direct observations and camera traps at eight sites across Indonesian Borneo we show how red langurs (Presbytis rubicunda) are more terrestrial than previously believed, regularly coming to the ground. This unusual behavior has been found at six of the eight sites surveyed. We find that red langurs come to the ground more frequently in disturbed forests, specifically ones which have been impacted by logging, fire, and hunting, though more data are needed to confirm this as a direct correlation. We also found a trend towards decreased ground use with increased elevation of the habitat. When on the ground, red langurs are predominantly engaged in feeding (50% direct observations, 61% camera traps) and traveling (29% direct observations, 13% camera traps). Red langurs are found on the ground throughout the day, at similar times to activity periods of the apex predator, the Sunda clouded leopard (Neofelis diardi). We suggest that ground use by red langurs could be an adaptation to disturbed forest to exploit additional food sources and to facilitate travel.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 42 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 17%
Student > Bachelor 5 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 12%
Student > Master 4 10%
Librarian 2 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 19 45%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 19%
Environmental Science 7 17%
Social Sciences 4 10%
Computer Science 1 2%
Design 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 21 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2021.
All research outputs
#3,748,051
of 23,096,849 outputs
Outputs from Primates
#243
of 1,018 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,702
of 329,152 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Primates
#6
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,096,849 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,018 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,152 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.