| Title |
Exploring New Physics Frontiers Through Numerical Relativity
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Living Reviews in Relativity, September 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/lrr-2015-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Vitor Cardoso, Leonardo Gualtieri, Carlos Herdeiro, Ulrich Sperhake |
| Abstract |
The demand to obtain answers to highly complex problems within strong-field gravity has been met with significant progress in the numerical solution of Einstein's equations - along with some spectacular results - in various setups. We review techniques for solving Einstein's equations in generic spacetimes, focusing on fully nonlinear evolutions but also on how to benchmark those results with perturbative approaches. The results address problems in high-energy physics, holography, mathematical physics, fundamental physics, astrophysics and cosmology. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | 18% |
| Greece | 1 | 9% |
| Guinea-Bissau | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 7 | 64% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 64% |
| Scientists | 3 | 27% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 4 | 5% |
| Canada | 2 | 2% |
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| China | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 76 | 86% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 23% |
| Researcher | 20 | 23% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 19 | 22% |
| Unknown | 14 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Physics and Astronomy | 69 | 78% |
| Mathematics | 3 | 3% |
| Engineering | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 15 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 September 2015.
All research outputs
#6,048,904
of 22,829,083 outputs
Outputs from Living Reviews in Relativity
#92
of 144 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,645
of 274,256 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Living Reviews in Relativity
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,829,083 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 144 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.4. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,256 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them