| Title |
Bibliometric-enhanced information retrieval: preface
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientometrics, July 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11192-018-2861-0 |
| Authors |
Guillaume Cabanac, Ingo Frommholz, Philipp Mayr |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 20% |
| Netherlands | 3 | 12% |
| Spain | 3 | 12% |
| United States | 2 | 8% |
| Germany | 2 | 8% |
| France | 2 | 8% |
| Peru | 1 | 4% |
| Pakistan | 1 | 4% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 4 | 16% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 56% |
| Scientists | 10 | 40% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 24 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 29% |
| Librarian | 3 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 8% |
| Professor | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 8% |
| Unknown | 7 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 6 | 25% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 13% |
| Engineering | 2 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 4% |
| Linguistics | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 17% |
| Unknown | 7 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 July 2019.
All research outputs
#1,884,858
of 23,096,849 outputs
Outputs from Scientometrics
#385
of 2,699 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,307
of 329,030 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientometrics
#14
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,096,849 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,699 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,030 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.