↓ Skip to main content

Adrenocortical carcinoma: effect of hospital volume on patient outcome

Overview of attention for article published in Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery, November 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
81 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
Title
Adrenocortical carcinoma: effect of hospital volume on patient outcome
Published in
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery, November 2011
DOI 10.1007/s00423-011-0866-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Celestino Pio Lombardi, Marco Raffaelli, Marco Boniardi, Giorgio De Toma, Luigi Antonio Marzano, Paolo Miccoli, Francesco Minni, Mario Morino, Maria Rosa Pelizzo, Andrea Pietrabissa, Andrea Renda, Andrea Valeri, Carmela De Crea, Rocco Bellantone

Abstract

Optimal management of adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) involves a detailed diagnostic workup, radical surgery, and appropriate adjuvant therapy. However, due to the rarity of this disease, adequate expertise is necessary to ensure optimal patient care. We evaluated if the experience of a treating center influences the outcome of ACC.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 3%
China 1 3%
Unknown 36 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 16%
Other 4 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 11%
Student > Postgraduate 3 8%
Other 10 26%
Unknown 7 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 66%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Psychology 1 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Unknown 10 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 November 2018.
All research outputs
#7,772,441
of 23,613,071 outputs
Outputs from Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery
#280
of 1,175 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,677
of 144,680 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery
#5
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,613,071 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,175 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 144,680 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.