↓ Skip to main content

Perspective distortion in craniofacial superimposition: Logarithmic decay curves mapped mathematically and by practical experiment

Overview of attention for article published in Forensic Science International, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Perspective distortion in craniofacial superimposition: Logarithmic decay curves mapped mathematically and by practical experiment
Published in
Forensic Science International, September 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.forsciint.2015.09.009
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carl N. Stephan

Abstract

The superimposition of a face photograph with that of a skull for identification purposes necessitates the use of comparable photographic parameters between the two image acquisition sessions, so that differences in optics and consequent recording of images does not thwart the morphological analysis. Widely divergent, but published, speculations about the thresholds at which perspective distortion becomes negligible (0.5 to >13.5m) must be resolved and perspective distortion (PD) relationships quantified across their full range to judge tolerance levels, and the suitability of commonly employed contemporary equipment (e.g., 1m photographic copy-stands). Herein, basic trigonometry is employed to map PD for two same sized 179mm linear lengths - separated anteroposteriorly by 127mm - as a function of subject-to-camera distance (SCD; 0.2-20m). These lengths approximate basic craniofacial heights (e.g., tr-n) and widths (e.g., zy-zy), while the latter approximates facial depth (e.g., n-t). As anticipated, PD decayed in logarithmic and continuous manner with increasing SCD. At SCD of 12m, the within-image PD was negligible (<1%). At <2.5m SCD, it exceeded 5% and increased sharply as SCD decreased. Since life size images of skulls and faces are commonly employed for superimposition, a relative 1% perspective distortion difference is recommended as the ceiling standard for craniofacial comparison (translates into a ≤2mm difference in physiognomical face height). Since superimposition depends on relative comparisons of a photographic pair (not one photograph), there is practically no scenario in superimposition casework where SCDs should be ignored and no single distance at which PD should be considered negligible (even if one image holds >12m SCD).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 19%
Researcher 3 14%
Student > Master 3 14%
Professor 2 10%
Student > Bachelor 2 10%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 6 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 19%
Social Sciences 3 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 10%
Arts and Humanities 1 5%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 10 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2015.
All research outputs
#20,656,820
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Forensic Science International
#3,224
of 4,088 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#209,231
of 285,680 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Forensic Science International
#33
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,088 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 285,680 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.