↓ Skip to main content

The evolutionary transition from RNA to DNA in early cells

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Molecular Evolution, August 1988
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
94 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
103 Mendeley
Title
The evolutionary transition from RNA to DNA in early cells
Published in
Journal of Molecular Evolution, August 1988
DOI 10.1007/bf02101189
Pubmed ID
Authors

A. Lazcano, R. Guerrero, L. Margulis, J. Oró

Abstract

The evolution of genetic material can be divided into at least three major phases: first, genomes of "nucleic acid-like" molecules; secondly, genomes of RNA; and finally, double-stranded DNA genomes such as those present in all contemporary cells. Using properties of nucleic acid molecules, we attempt to explain the evolutionary transition from RNA alone as a cellular informational macromolecule prior to the evolution of cell systems based on double-stranded DNA. The idea that ribonucleic acid-based cellular genomes preceded DNA is based on the following: (1) protein synthesis can occur in the absence of DNA but not of RNA; (2) RNA molecules have some catalytic properties; (3) the ubiquity of purine and pyridine nucleotide coenzymes as well as other similar ribonucleotide cofactors in metabolic pathways; and (4) the fact that the biosynthesis of deoxyribonucleotides always proceeds via the enzymatic reduction of ribonucleotides. The "RNA prior to DNA" hypothesis can be further developed by understanding the selective pressures that led to the biosynthesis of deoxyribose, thymine, and proofreading DNA polymerases. Taken together these observations suggest to us that DNA was selected as an informational molecule in cells to stabilize earlier RNA-protein replicating systems.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 2 2%
Ireland 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 97 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 17%
Researcher 15 15%
Student > Bachelor 15 15%
Professor 11 11%
Student > Master 9 9%
Other 19 18%
Unknown 17 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 25 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 24 23%
Chemistry 14 14%
Environmental Science 5 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 4%
Other 11 11%
Unknown 20 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2024.
All research outputs
#4,822,459
of 25,388,353 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Molecular Evolution
#239
of 1,487 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,392
of 12,434 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Molecular Evolution
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,388,353 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,487 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 12,434 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.