↓ Skip to main content

A novel NCSTN gene mutation in a Chinese family with acne inversa

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Genetics and Genomics, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
Title
A novel NCSTN gene mutation in a Chinese family with acne inversa
Published in
Molecular Genetics and Genomics, July 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00438-018-1475-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chao Wu, Jun Yang, Shiyu Zhang, Jun Li, Hongzhong Jin, Xue Zhang

Abstract

Acne inversa (AI) is a chronic inflammatory disease of hair follicles. The pathogenesis of AI remains unclear. Haploinsufficiency of genes encoding γ-secretase components is the genetic basis for a subset of familial AI. Idiopathic guttate hypomelanosis (IGH) is a leukoderma characterized by multiple porcelain-white macules. Familial AI associated with IGH has not been reported previously. Herein, we present the pathogenic variation in a Chinese Han family with AI and IGH. Peripheral blood samples were collected from 16 members of the entire family. Eighteen exons and flanking introns of the NCSTN gene were amplified by polymerase chain reaction. Two hundred unrelated healthy Chinese subjects were used as controls. Sequencing results were analysed using CodonCode Aligner Software. Seven of the 16 family members in three generations were AI patients. Six AI patients also had IGH, while the other only had AI. One had IGH without AI. All AI patients carried the mutation, c.218delC, located in exon 4 of NCSTN. The deletion mutation led to a reading frame shift and the appearance of a premature termination codon (p.P73Lfs*15), resulting in the production of truncated protein. Family members without AI did not carry this mutation, indicating that it cosegregated with the phenotype. The mutation was not detected among the controls. This mutation has not been reported in the EXaC, HGMD, and dbSNP databases. In addition, we performed whole-exome sequencing on the proband and finally screened six candidate genes, ADAMTS2, BUB1B, CRB2, FBLN1, SEC24B, and WNK1, which we further validated in effected family members, and none of them were cosegregated. In conclusion, we identified a novel deletion mutation in exon 4 of NCSTN, which may underlie the molecular pathogenesis in this AI family. However, we found no relationship between this mutation and IGH.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 23%
Student > Bachelor 4 18%
Other 1 5%
Lecturer 1 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 8 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 32%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 14%
Chemistry 1 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 5%
Unknown 10 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 August 2018.
All research outputs
#19,954,338
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Genetics and Genomics
#2,886
of 3,321 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#248,864
of 340,079 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Genetics and Genomics
#14
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,321 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,079 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.