↓ Skip to main content

The effect of heart rate on coronary plaque measurements in 320-row coronary CT angiography

Overview of attention for article published in The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
Title
The effect of heart rate on coronary plaque measurements in 320-row coronary CT angiography
Published in
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging, July 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10554-018-1415-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Masafumi Kidoh, Daisuke Utsunomiya, Yoshinori Funama, Daisuke Sakabe, Seitaro Oda, Takeshi Nakaura, Hideaki Yuki, Yasunori Nagayama, Kenichiro Hirata, Yuji Iyama, Tomohiro Namimoto, Yasuyuki Yamashita

Abstract

Repeatability of quantitative assessment of atherosclerotic plaques is important for the accurate detection of high-risk plaques in coronary CT angiography (CTA). We assessed the effect of heart rate (HR) on plaque CT number using a coronary artery model and a cardiac phantom capable of simulating cardiac motion. The coronary artery model with luminal stenosis on a cardiac phantom was imaged with a simulated HR of 0, 50, 60, and 70 beats per minute using a 320-row CT scanner. We reconstructed CT images for cardiac diastolic phases (for 75% R-R interval) using filtered back projection (FBP), hybrid iterative reconstruction (AIDR3D), and model-based iterative reconstruction (FIRST). Two observers measured plaque attenuation in the lesion with 75% stenosis. The coefficient of determination (R2) was obtained to evaluate interobserver agreement. At HR 70, FIRST improved the correlation between two observers compared with FBP and AIDR3D (FIRST: R2 = 0.68, p < 0.05; FBP: R2 = 0.29, p = 0.31; AIDR3D: R2 = 0.22, p = 0.18). These R2 at HR 70 were lower compared with at HR 50 (FIRST: R2 = 0.92, p < 0.05; FBP: R2 = 0.83, p < 0.05; AIDR3D: R2 = 0.87, p < 0.05) and HR 0 (FIRST: R2 = 0.97, p < 0.05; FBP: R2 = 0.89, p < 0.05; AIDR3D: R2 = 0.95, p < 0.05). Higher HR affected plaque measurement repeatability in coronary CTA. FIRST may improve plaque measurement repeatability at the higher HR compared with FBP and AIDR3D.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 20%
Student > Bachelor 2 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Other 3 20%
Unknown 3 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 7%
Sports and Recreations 1 7%
Computer Science 1 7%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 4 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 July 2018.
All research outputs
#22,767,715
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging
#1,460
of 2,012 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#297,801
of 340,079 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging
#24
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,012 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,079 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.