↓ Skip to main content

A scaling aneurysm model-based approach to assessing the role of flow pattern and energy loss in aneurysm rupture prediction

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Translational Medicine, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
Title
A scaling aneurysm model-based approach to assessing the role of flow pattern and energy loss in aneurysm rupture prediction
Published in
Journal of Translational Medicine, September 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12967-015-0673-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yunling Long, Jingru Zhong, Hongyu Yu, Huagang Yan, Zhizheng Zhuo, Qianqian Meng, Xinjian Yang, Haiyun Li

Abstract

Energy loss (EL) was regarded to be one of the key parameters in predicting the rupture risk of IA. In this paper, we took varied aspect ratio (AR) as a scaling law to create a series of longitudinal models to investigate the longitudinal changes of flow pattern and EL as the AR varies, in order to explore the relationship between the longitudinal characteristic EL parameters with aneurysm rupture risk. Seven original intracranial aneurysms (IA) models with similar locations were reconstructed from patient 3D rotational angiography (3DRA) images. Based on these models, a series of scaling aneurysm models with different ARs were created with our proposed scaling algorithms. Fluid-solid interaction (FSI) simulations were performed on every model to obtain hemodynamics flow pattern and EL. With AR increasing, flow pattern became more complex, with vortices appearing gradually in the aneurysms (AR > 1.5). Furthermore, the velocity significantly decreased in aneurysms with high ARs (>1.5). Meanwhile, the aneurysm EL increased with increasing AR. Once AR exceeded 1.5, EL changed drastically. EL was a potential parameter predicting future rupture of unruptured aneurysms. If the EL during the growth of the unruptured aneurysms increased sharply, we strongly recommend an intervention.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 3%
Unknown 29 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 40%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 17%
Researcher 2 7%
Other 1 3%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 3%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 6 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 20%
Engineering 6 20%
Computer Science 3 10%
Neuroscience 3 10%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 7%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 8 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2015.
All research outputs
#14,238,817
of 22,829,083 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Translational Medicine
#1,783
of 3,994 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#141,869
of 274,417 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Translational Medicine
#48
of 91 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,829,083 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,994 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,417 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 91 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.