↓ Skip to main content

BIDCHIPS: bias decomposition and removal from ChIP-seq data clarifies true binding signal and its functional correlates

Overview of attention for article published in Epigenetics & Chromatin, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
Title
BIDCHIPS: bias decomposition and removal from ChIP-seq data clarifies true binding signal and its functional correlates
Published in
Epigenetics & Chromatin, September 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13072-015-0028-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Parameswaran Ramachandran, Gareth A. Palidwor, Theodore J. Perkins

Abstract

Unraveling transcriptional regulatory networks is a central problem in molecular biology and, in this quest, chromatin immunoprecipitation and sequencing (ChIP-seq) technology has given us the unprecedented ability to identify sites of protein-DNA binding and histone modification genome wide. However, multiple systemic and procedural biases hinder harnessing the full potential of this technology. Previous studies have addressed this problem, but a thorough characterization of different, interacting biases on ChIP-seq signals is still lacking. Here, we present a novel framework where the genome-wide ChIP-seq signal is viewed as being quantifiably influenced by different, measurable sources of bias, which can then be computationally subtracted away. We use a compendium of 123 human ENCODE ChIP-seq datasets to build regression models that tell us how much of a ChIP-seq signal can be attributed to mappability, GC-content, chromatin accessibility, and factors represented in input DNA and IgG controls. When we use the model to separate out these non-binding influences from the ChIP-seq signal, we obtain a purified signal that associates better to TF-DNA-binding motifs than do other measures of peak significance. We also carry out a multiscale analysis that reveals how ChIP-seq signal biases differ across different scales. Finally, we investigate previously reported associations between gene expression and ChIP-seq signals at transcription start sites. We show that our model can be used to discriminate ChIP-seq signals that are truly related to gene expression from those that are merely correlated by virtue of bias-in particular, chromatin accessibility bias, which shows up in ChIP-seq signals and also relates to gene expression. Our study provides new insights into the behavior of ChIP-seq signal biases and proposes a novel mitigation framework that improves results compared to existing techniques. With ChIP-seq now being the central technology for studying transcriptional regulation, it is most crucial to accurately characterize, quantify, and adjust for the genome-wide effects of biases affecting ChIP-seq. Our study also emphasizes that properly accounting for confounders in ChIP-seq data is of paramount importance for obtaining biologically accurate insights into the workings of the complex regulatory mechanisms in living organisms. R and MATLAB packages implementing the framework can be obtained from http://www.perkinslab.ca/Software.html.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 4%
Norway 1 2%
France 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Italy 1 2%
Unknown 51 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 21%
Student > Master 6 11%
Professor 4 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 7%
Other 10 18%
Unknown 7 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 33%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 32%
Computer Science 5 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 10 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 September 2015.
All research outputs
#14,450,318
of 25,464,544 outputs
Outputs from Epigenetics & Chromatin
#369
of 615 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#127,952
of 284,011 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Epigenetics & Chromatin
#13
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,464,544 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 615 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 284,011 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.