| Title |
Hydrochlorothiazide compared to chlorthalidone in reduction of urinary calcium in patients with kidney stones
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Urolithiasis, May 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00240-013-0568-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Dawn F. Wolfgram, Vinod Gundu, Brad C. Astor, R. Allan Jhagroo |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 13 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 38% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 2 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 54% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 23% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 1 | 8% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 July 2018.
All research outputs
#7,573,552
of 23,096,849 outputs
Outputs from Urolithiasis
#129
of 332 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,806
of 194,324 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Urolithiasis
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,096,849 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 332 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,324 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.