You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
基幹的能力の概念を軸とした障害者の賃金についての考察 : 合理的配慮規定に関連して(障害者雇用・就労における「合理的配慮」)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Social Policy and Labor Studies, July 2015
|
| DOI | 10.24533/spls.7.1_99 |
| Authors |
山村 りつ |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 4 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 December 2019.
All research outputs
#7,346,235
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Social Policy and Labor Studies
#11
of 47 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,787
of 277,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Social Policy and Labor Studies
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 47 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one scored the same or higher as 36 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,660 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them