| Title |
Optimal power-to-mass ratios when predicting flat and hill-climbing time-trial cycling
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Applied Physiology, May 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00421-006-0189-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
A. M. Nevill, S. A. Jobson, R. C. R. Davison, A. E. Jeukendrup |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 80 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 16% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 9% |
| Researcher | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 24 | 28% |
| Unknown | 9 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 46 | 53% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 7% |
| Psychology | 5 | 6% |
| Engineering | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 10 | 11% |
| Unknown | 9 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2016.
All research outputs
#15,518,326
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#2,942
of 4,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,348
of 83,745 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#12
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,345 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 83,745 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.