↓ Skip to main content

水道直結式ミスト発生装置の維持管理方法について

Overview of attention for article published in [Nippon kōshū eisei zasshi] Japanese journal of public health, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
水道直結式ミスト発生装置の維持管理方法について
Published in
[Nippon kōshū eisei zasshi] Japanese journal of public health, January 2015
DOI 10.11236/jph.62.4_182
Pubmed ID
Authors

濱武 通子, 青木 梨絵, 山﨑 貢, 大西 賢治郎, 松本 一年

Abstract

Objectives Water mist is usually generated using equipment directly connected to the water tap, as its installation is relatively easy. However, there is no legal regulation regarding the maintenance of this equipment, and the quality of the mist has not been sufficiently well investigated. In this study, we sought to establish methods that allow the hygienic maintenance of this equipment.Methods We monitored the use of the mist generating equipment in five of the 61 institutions in the jurisdiction of Ichinomiya Health Center, examined the resulting water quality, and tested for Legionella bacteria in the mist. If equipment was found to contain bacteria, the contaminated part was identified by counting the number of bacteria in the water after sequentially washing and disinfecting parts of the equipment. We also identified the predominant bacterial species.Results In the water mists from three of 5 institutions, the number of bacteria greatly exceeded that permitted for drinking-water, even though the residual chlorine level was >0.1 mg/l. However, no Legionella bacteria were detected. Brevundimonas species were predominant in the water mists at each institute. The hose was found to be the contaminated component in each case.Conclusion Our findings suggest that the number of bacteria in the water mist exceeded the drinking-water quality standard, even with a residual chlorine level of >0.1 mg/l. This study also revealed the importance of the continued drainage of water, following suitable cleaning and disinfection for maintenance of the mist-generating equipment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 33%
Other 1 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 17%
Unknown 2 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 1 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 17%
Mathematics 1 17%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 17%
Engineering 1 17%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 July 2022.
All research outputs
#8,188,597
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from [Nippon kōshū eisei zasshi] Japanese journal of public health
#58
of 451 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,188
of 359,549 outputs
Outputs of similar age from [Nippon kōshū eisei zasshi] Japanese journal of public health
#5
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 451 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,549 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.