↓ Skip to main content

Impact of balloon laryngoplasty on management of acute subglottic stenosis

Overview of attention for article published in European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
Title
Impact of balloon laryngoplasty on management of acute subglottic stenosis
Published in
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, July 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00405-018-5064-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andréia Melchiors Wenzel, Cláudia Schweiger, Denise Manica, Leo Sekine, Isabel Cristina Schütz Ferreira, Gabriel Kuhl, Paulo José Cauduro Marostica

Abstract

To assess the impact of balloon laryngoplasty on clinical and surgical outcomes in pediatric patients with acute subglottic stenosis. Two case series were included and compared. The first group included patients treated initially either with tracheostomy (if severe symptoms) or with close follow-up (if mild symptoms). Those children underwent re-evaluation and specific treatment of their stenosis with laser incisions or open surgeries some weeks later. The other group included children treated initially with balloon laryngoplasty, reflecting a shift in surgical practice after 2009. Data as success of the procedure, mean hospital stay, mean pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) stay, post-procedure fever, need of antibiotics, procedure-related complications, and deaths were assessed and compared between both cohorts. The sample comprised 38 pediatric patients aged 0-5 years. Fifteen children were treated before 2009, of who 10 (66.7%) required tracheostomy soon after the diagnosis. Ultimately, 13 (86.6%) underwent laryngotracheal reconstruction. Twenty-three children were treated after 2009 and the success rate in these patients treated primarily with balloon laryngoplasty was 82.6%. Of these, only 3 (13%) required tracheostomy and 1 (4.3%) required further open laryngotracheal reconstruction. Patients treated by balloon laryngoplasty underwent fewer procedures under general anesthesia and had a lower burden of treatment-related morbidity, as denoted by shorter PICU stay, less antibiotic use, earlier postoperative resumption of oral feeding, and a lower incidence of postoperative complications and fever. When used for management of acute laryngeal stenosis, balloon laryngoplasty is associated with a high success rate, presenting lower morbidity than open surgery.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 5 15%
Student > Bachelor 4 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 6%
Researcher 2 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 6%
Other 5 15%
Unknown 13 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 9%
Engineering 1 3%
Unknown 18 55%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 July 2018.
All research outputs
#20,527,576
of 23,096,849 outputs
Outputs from European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology
#2,063
of 3,125 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#286,483
of 327,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology
#26
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,096,849 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,125 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,151 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.