↓ Skip to main content

No alignment of cattle along geomagnetic field lines found

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Comparative Physiology A, February 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#36 of 1,484)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
4 blogs
twitter
13 X users
wikipedia
8 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
Title
No alignment of cattle along geomagnetic field lines found
Published in
Journal of Comparative Physiology A, February 2011
DOI 10.1007/s00359-011-0628-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

J. Hert, L. Jelinek, L. Pekarek, A. Pavlicek

Abstract

This paper presents a study of the body orientation of domestic cattle on free pastures in several European states, based on the Google satellite photographs. In sum, 232 herds with 3,412 individuals were evaluated. Two independent groups participated in our study and came to the same conclusion that in contradiction to the recent findings of other researchers, no alignment of the animals and of their herds along geomagnetic field lines could be found. Several possible reasons for this discrepancy should be taken into consideration: poor quality of Google satellite photographs, difficulties in determining the body axis, selection of herds or animals within herds, lack of blinding in the evaluation, possible subconscious bias, and, most importantly, high sensitivity of the calculated main directions of the Rayleigh vectors to some kind of bias or to some overlooked or ignored confounder. This factor could easily have led to an unsubstantiated positive conclusion about the existence of magnetoreception.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 2 4%
Czechia 2 4%
Israel 1 2%
Austria 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Spain 1 2%
Unknown 47 85%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 22%
Student > Bachelor 9 16%
Researcher 8 15%
Student > Master 6 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 4%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 12 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 27 49%
Physics and Astronomy 4 7%
Environmental Science 2 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 4%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 11 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 43. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2021.
All research outputs
#918,728
of 24,661,808 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Comparative Physiology A
#36
of 1,484 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,446
of 194,765 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Comparative Physiology A
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,661,808 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,484 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,765 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.