↓ Skip to main content

Emptying a Paradox of Ground

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Philosophical Logic, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
Title
Emptying a Paradox of Ground
Published in
Journal of Philosophical Logic, July 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10992-017-9442-1
Authors

Jack Woods

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 18%
Student > Master 2 18%
Student > Bachelor 1 9%
Lecturer 1 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 9%
Other 1 9%
Unknown 3 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Philosophy 5 45%
Arts and Humanities 1 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 9%
Unknown 3 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 2018.
All research outputs
#17,985,001
of 23,096,849 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Philosophical Logic
#243
of 354 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#224,452
of 312,758 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Philosophical Logic
#4
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,096,849 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 354 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,758 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.