↓ Skip to main content

The NULevel trial of a scalable, technology-assisted weight loss maintenance intervention for obese adults after clinically significant weight loss: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
27 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
286 Mendeley
Title
The NULevel trial of a scalable, technology-assisted weight loss maintenance intervention for obese adults after clinically significant weight loss: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
Published in
Trials, September 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13063-015-0931-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elizabeth H. Evans, Vera Araújo-Soares, Ashley Adamson, Alan M. Batterham, Heather Brown, Miglena Campbell, Stephan U. Dombrowski, Alison Guest, Daniel Jackson, Dominika Kwasnicka, Karim Ladha, Elaine McColl, Patrick Olivier, Alexander J. Rothman, Kirby Sainsbury, Alison J. Steel, Ian Nicholas Steen, Luke Vale, Martin White, Peter Wright, Falko F. Sniehotta

Abstract

Effective weight loss interventions are widely available but, after weight loss, most individuals regain weight. This article describes the protocol for the NULevel trial evaluating the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a systematically developed, inexpensive, scalable, technology-assisted, behavioural intervention for weight loss maintenance (WLM) in obese adults after initial weight loss. A 12-month single-centre, two-armed parallel group, participant randomised controlled superiority trial is underway, recruiting a total of 288 previously obese adults after weight loss of ≥5 % within the previous 12 months. Participants are randomly assigned to intervention or control arms, with a 1:1 allocation, stratified by sex and percentage of body weight lost (<10 % vs ≥10 %). Change in weight (kg) from baseline to 12 months is the primary outcome. Weight, other anthropometric variables and 7-day physical activity (assessed via accelerometer) measures are taken at 0 and 12 months. Questionnaires at 0, 6 and 12 months assess psychological process variables, health service use and participant costs. Participants in the intervention arm initially attend an individual face-to-face WLM consultation with an intervention facilitator and then use a mobile internet platform to self-monitor and report their diet, daily activity (via pedometer) and weight through daily weighing on wirelessly connected scales. Automated feedback via mobile phone, tailored to participants' weight regain and goal progress is provided. Participants in the control arm receive quarterly newsletters (via links embedded in text messages) and wirelessly connected scales. Qualitative process evaluation interviews are conducted with a subsample of up to 40 randomly chosen participants. Acceptability and feasibility of procedures, cost-effectiveness, and relationships among socioeconomic variables and WLM will also be assessed. It is hypothesised that participants allocated to the intervention arm will show significantly lower levels of weight regain from baseline than those in the control arm. To date, this is the first WLM trial using remote real-time weight monitoring and mobile internet platforms to deliver a flexible, efficient and scalable intervention, tailored to the individual. This trial addresses a key research need and has the potential to make a vital contribution to the evidence base to inform future WLM policy and provision. http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN14657176 (registration date 20 March 2014).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 286 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 282 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 44 15%
Researcher 41 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 39 14%
Student > Bachelor 33 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 7%
Other 43 15%
Unknown 67 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 47 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 45 16%
Psychology 36 13%
Sports and Recreations 15 5%
Computer Science 13 5%
Other 45 16%
Unknown 85 30%