↓ Skip to main content

Drought-driven change in wildlife distribution and numbers: a case study of koalas in south west Queensland

Overview of attention for article published in Wildlife Research, November 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
5 X users
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
93 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
117 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Drought-driven change in wildlife distribution and numbers: a case study of koalas in south west Queensland
Published in
Wildlife Research, November 2011
DOI 10.1071/wr11064
Authors

Leonie Seabrook, Clive McAlpine, Greg Baxter, Jonathan Rhodes, Adrian Bradley, Daniel Lunney

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 115 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 14%
Student > Bachelor 16 14%
Researcher 15 13%
Student > Master 13 11%
Student > Postgraduate 6 5%
Other 13 11%
Unknown 38 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 32 27%
Environmental Science 26 22%
Engineering 4 3%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 3%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Other 7 6%
Unknown 41 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 January 2022.
All research outputs
#1,494,049
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Wildlife Research
#142
of 1,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,892
of 154,033 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Wildlife Research
#5
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,240 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 154,033 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.