↓ Skip to main content

Integration of anatomical and external response mappings explains crossing effects in tactile localization: A probabilistic modeling approach

Overview of attention for article published in Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
Title
Integration of anatomical and external response mappings explains crossing effects in tactile localization: A probabilistic modeling approach
Published in
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, September 2015
DOI 10.3758/s13423-015-0918-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stephanie Badde, Tobias Heed, Brigitte Röder

Abstract

To act upon a tactile stimulus its original skin-based, anatomical spatial code has to be transformed into an external, posture-dependent reference frame, a process known as tactile remapping. When the limbs are crossed, anatomical and external location codes are in conflict, leading to a decline in tactile localization accuracy. It is unknown whether this impairment originates from the integration of the resulting external localization response with the original, anatomical one or from a failure of tactile remapping in crossed postures. We fitted probabilistic models based on these diverging accounts to the data from three tactile localization experiments. Hand crossing disturbed tactile left-right location choices in all experiments. Furthermore, the size of these crossing effects was modulated by stimulus configuration and task instructions. The best model accounted for these results by integration of the external response mapping with the original, anatomical one, while applying identical integration weights for uncrossed and crossed postures. Thus, the model explained the data without assuming failures of remapping. Moreover, performance differences across tasks were accounted for by non-individual parameter adjustments, indicating that individual participants' task adaptation results from one common functional mechanism. These results suggest that remapping is an automatic and accurate process, and that the observed localization impairments in touch result from a cognitively controlled integration process that combines anatomically and externally coded responses.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 42 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 14%
Researcher 5 12%
Student > Master 5 12%
Student > Bachelor 4 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 10%
Other 8 19%
Unknown 10 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 15 36%
Neuroscience 9 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 5%
Social Sciences 1 2%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 9 21%